🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, actor Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for portraying the Russian leader in a new film. The movie, though, may align so closely with the carefully constructed image promoted by Russian state media that, domestically, it functions as a endorsement rather than a critique.

The Manufactured Superhero

Over a long period, the Kremlin and the country's pop-culture machine have worked together to forge a made-to-measure version of Putin. This character is an infallible strategist devoid of flaws, an ex-intelligence officer reframed as a local 007 who always knows more than he reveals.

“In Russia, the manufactured Putin has long overshadowed the real one.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

One recent example is a TV series released last October, helmed by a pro-government filmmaker. Its main character is a fictional blue-eyed lieutenant colonel inexplicably chosen to “rescue” the nation from disorder. Although the character's name a different name, the message is unmistakable: the savior must be a known figure from the secret services.

International depictions frequently result in buttressing this identical story rather than undercutting it. A new film inspired by a bestselling satirical novel sets out to undermine the Putin cult by framing him not as a cause but as a symptom, shifting the narrative weight to the spin doctors around him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

In the film, the president is presented as having been picked by powerful oligarchs to stabilise the nation because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. The oligarchs approach him and practically plead him to become president. His response is that he would rather govern from the shadows, seeking enduring influence.

This tale is the Kremlin’s export myth: the cool, reluctant strategist shaped by destiny. In reality, these events took place.

The Truth Behind the Selection

No one ever begged Putin to take the job. The position was effectively a selection process with no shortage of contenders. Central to this process stood a powerful businessman from the previous administration who planned to control the state in practice.

• His list included various figures, among them a reformer later murdered and a former spy chief.
• Per an expert who researched Putin’s biography, the future president simply fitted the required parameters: loyal, from the security services, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A property developer familiar with the events said the primary requirement was manageability and loyalty, not leadership.

“They didn’t need a strong candidate, they needed someone controllable, someone who would obey orders.”

Building the 007 Persona

Experts agree that the notion of Putin as a master operative was constructed retrospectively. Claims about his “recruitment work” in Dresden do not stand up to scrutiny. In essence, he handled paperwork and technical tasks, a mid-level functionary not involved with actual agent work.

Interestingly, the shift to depicting him as a “007” may in part have been inspired by the actor's arrival as 007. The grittier version prompted Russian media and social media to make comparisons with Putin. Edited images replacing Craig’s face with Putin’s surfaced on Moscow streets, feeding the growing tendency to see him as a local secret agent.

A Propaganda Win?

With Jude Law, an actor popular with viewers there, the Kremlin will not miss the chance to frame his casting as a small victory. The film's exclusion of mass protests, the political rivals, or prominent activists in the story, despite covering the past decade, is a pleasant bonus for official messaging.

Domestically, the president is often an omnipotent figure who never appears on screen. His influence is hinted at through photographs or orders from on high. In this new film, he at last gets a famous actor's visage—one that may inadvertently validate the very myths it perhaps aims to question.