🔗 Share this article

Only two days prior to the New York race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – not just the winner citywide, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst who grew up in the city, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a local celebrity this year for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious although failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, certain media outlets and financial newspapers outrank the New York Times” in readership and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

What was your election night?

It was necessary because they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the system every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but there were large groups of votes that came in later and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, it was possible in which election day went somewhat badly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo was going to end up essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. However the winner gained 500,000 votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he won. He went out and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect get those extra votes from?

He assembled the alliance that the left always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, tenants and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, young, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president previously backed Zohran now. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I figured we might go over two million, but it reached 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to surpass 50%. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still probably 200K ballots uncounted at that time. Thus it’s not certain, but I think probable, and I hope he achieves it so then no one can say Sliwa was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Not even Tottenville in the borough, similar to an highly conservative neighborhood. That really was unexpected. The independent held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added all of these conservatives on the island who had a high participation. I believe there was a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to Trump endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani dominant in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and residents all went for the independent. Thus there was a little resistance. However overall, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani won – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election there was coverage on whether Mamdani was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

Exist areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were pretty staunchly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if existed major surprises on this one, but he retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from progressives hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be additional examples – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

However I think that every city in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – because youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.