🔗 Share this article

In contemporary Britain, public demonstration has ceased to be a fundamental right. Rather, it has become a privilege that authorities grant or deny at their discretion. This constitutes the underlying meaning of proposed measures that the current government is putting forward, which would dictate when and where protests can occur, with possible prison sentences for those who defy these restrictions.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Earlier administrations had already weakened this essential right: the former Conservative government had granted law enforcement sweeping new authorities, which global rights bodies had condemned as "significant and unjustified limitations" on civil liberties. Taken together, these incremental assaults on liberty have practically eliminated the hard-won right to freedom of protest.

Exploiting Tragedy to Rationalize Suppression

The most recent restrictive measures are being defended by citing last week's terrible anti-Jewish assault on a British Islamic center. There should be universal agreement that the safety of Jewish communities in Britain must be protected. However, employing this horrific incident as a justification to stifle dissent is not only disconnected to that duty but distorts it.

"If you cannot draw the line at genocide, you probably can't establish limits at democratic principles," observed a well-known American author, a statement that applies equally for the present administration.

Historical Context of Protest

Consider Britain's rich history of protest and activism against racism and authoritarianism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to postwar Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s demonstrations against the National Front. Many of these historical demonstrators were branded as extremists in their time, even while they were advocating the rights of minorities.

Present Situation

In today's complicated landscape, here's what's actually occurring: The Israeli government – a foreign state – is perpetrating acts that international bodies have characterized as genocide. Its military actions have led the global justice body to issue arrest warrants against Israel's prime minister and his ex-military leader.

Western popular sentiment has shifted dramatically against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a large percentage of citizens believe Israel has probably committed international law violations. Most people would support a total prohibition on weapons exports to the state, and back the arrest of the Israeli leader.

Suppressing Opposition

Having essentially lost the public debate, Israel's supporters are now seizing on a despicable antisemitic crime to attempt to suppress a mass movement against a moral catastrophe. The British government appears to be included in this attempt. Ministers have not enacted extensive restrictions on Israel and have permitted weapon shipments to continue.

People who are demonstrating against the erasure of Gaza have been characterized as hateful extremists. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a more extensive suppression on these demonstrators until now: very limited protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities minimal reason to intervene.

Dangerous Conflation

Merging Jewish heritage with the actions of the Israeli state is not only cynical but also dangerous. The official definition of antisemitism, accepted by the British government and many organizations, has been rightly challenged for potentially stifling legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its key examples: that "making Jewish people collectively responsible for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've reached a situation where police authorities can suggest that demonstrations opposing Israel's actions should be canceled because they might "inadvertently or deliberately" support anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, political figures have declared that acknowledgment of Palestinian statehood has made organizations "implicated" in alleged abuse faced by British Jews.

Double Standards

On the very day as the synagogue attack, the Israeli military killed dozens of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – adding to the horrific toll from 24 months of ongoing violence that have claimed tens of thousands of lives. British political leaders and news organizations have barely concealed the limited value they attach to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the boldest demonstrations of discrimination in contemporary society.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already passed a concerning threshold by proscribing a specific activist group, a non-violent, human rights-focused direct action organization. Thousands of British protesters have been arrested, mostly for carrying signs opposing genocide and endorsing the banned organization. Many of those arrested are pensioners; among them a former clergyman and the child of a Holocaust survivor.

International Parallels

It's easy to see where this trajectory leads. In the United States, political leaders helped vilify pro-Palestinian protests: a ex-political leader implied that some were "connected to" other nations, while the current president characterized such protests as antisemitic. In taking these actions, they contributed to normalizing the repressive measures on such protests – and on free speech in general.

Future Concerns

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be granted extensive authority to control opposition. What might a new administration do with this restrictive framework? Our ancestors fought, suffered and died to secure our liberties. We may eventually rue how casually we permitted them to be eroded.